SMH on “Atheism’s True Believers”
Sydney Morning Herald, Sat 13 Feb 2010:
Atheism’s true believers gather
(I thoroughly dislike that egregiously distorted title for a start!
But what better can one expect from a newspaper religion reporting hack?)
The new age of activist atheism, which began with the publication of bestsellers such as Richard Dawkins’s The God Delusion (2006), and Christopher Hitchens’s polemic God is Not Great (2007), has grown into a loose global coalition of civil libertarians, liberals and gay rights activists.
Next month the incipient Australian movement will come together for the Global Atheist Convention in Melbourne. Speakers include Dawkins, the movement’s supreme deity; the philosopher Peter Singer; and Dan Barker, a prominent American atheist activist and former Christian preacher.
Jacqueline Maley is the Herald’s religion reporter, and she should be re-educated into the world of reality.
“Dawkins, the movement’s supreme deity…” is either a pathetic attempt at ironic humour, or another gross distortion of reality.
You decide…
Organisers say it is the largest such event to be held in Australia, and perhaps in the world. The 2500-capacity convention is sold out and there is even a waiting list.
Something you will never see: an atheist boarding a plane with a bomb strapped to him, waving a copy of On The Origin Of Species, before he blows himself up in a violent attempt to further his cause.
— So says David Nicholls
I have a small issue with the confidence of this assertion, and it leaves David open to attack.
One needs only consider the case of Tamil terrorists to get an idea that the concept of an atheist suicide bomber boarding a plane with a bomb is not at all out of the question. (And is, in fact, a distinct likelihood.)
Granted, the trivial omission of waving said book gives David an ‘out’, but one that does not impress me at all with it’s maturity, considering the grim topic at hand.
I think that he should cease using this analogy in future.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Michael Kingsford Gray on February 13, 2010 at 9:48 am, and is filed under Activism, Politics, Society. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. |











about 1 year ago
Perhaps better to point out that the suicide bombers were all (?) religiously motivated. If being heavily into religion makes you blow up yourself, kill doctors or seek to discriminate against homosexuals, perhaps the problem lies in the religion.
about 1 year ago
This is more interesting:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/pastors-ban-sparks-unholy-anglican-stoush-20100212-nxm4.html
… The Anglican church discriminated against him, slandered him and generally behaved viciously towards him because he “questioned the accuracy of the Old Testament”.
about 1 year ago
Thanks Nick.
Re #1, I also am not sure that no atheist terrorist has yet to be a suicide bomber on an aeroplane. It is possible, as I suggested, that they have in Sri Lanka, but NOT as a result of their lack of proof in a deity! I suspect that we may take these Tamils at their word, and assume that their grievance is political.
And the Tamil terrorists do not indulge in robbery of our earnings via automatic tax deductions. Religious terrorists are directly funded by our taxes.
As you so cogently alluded: it takes religion to make a good person commit atrocious deeds.
#2: That article was very interesting. Did you consider posting it as a news item? Or do you not yet have the authority to so do? Because if you do have the means, then I strongly encourage you to become a contributor, as this article is exactly what we are looking for!
Being ostracised for saying out loud what every educated person is actually thinking! Only in the Church and perhaps the Mafia.
His first mistake was to actually read the Bible.
His second was to understand it.
It’s all downhill from there.
I expect his journey from believer to atheist is about half completed.
Perhaps we should invite him to a meeting?